Sheriff Dart Misleads the Public About Electronic Monitoring House Arrest Conditions

In an interview with WLS AM, Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart called advocates “morons” who tell “unmitigated lie[s]” about his pretrial electronic monitoring program: “Some of these morons…spin this nonsense about home monitoring [that] a poor person can't go to his job—that's an unmitigated lie.”

Fact Check: FALSE

The Briefing

Before the Pretrial Fairness Act, people on pretrial electronic monitoring needed the Sheriff or a judge to approve their “movement” to leave their homes for any amount of time. If a person on electronic monitoring wanted to go somewhere, they had to get documentation and share it with the Sheriff’s Office three days in advance. This process took a notoriously long time, and in many instances, people were arbitrarily denied movement and not given permission to leave their home. In addition, many appointments do not regularly provide the written notices required by the Sheriff’s Office, making it impossible for people to provide documentation.

If someone did not have a job or lost it due to not having approved movement, getting approval to leave home for new job interviews was extremely difficult. The Sheriff’s Office requires verification from an employer of an interview before a person can leave their home, making it impossible to attend job fairs, seek out jobs that require walk-in applications, or meet an employer without fully disclosing a pending case. The requirements for movement also make it nearly impossible to work jobs where there is not a single, static location, such as construction or delivery jobs. 

The Pretrial Fairness Act’s electronic monitoring provisions took effect on January 1, 2022 and expanded the rights of people incarcerated in their homes on electronic monitoring. People on electronic monitoring are now guaranteed movement to perform essential tasks and given at least two periods of movement per week so that they are able to take care of themselves and their loved ones. Even with these provisions, it remains difficult to obtain and retain employment on electronic monitoring.

Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart Spreads Disinformation about Electronic Monitoring Reforms

Will County Judge Erroneously Blames the Pretrial Fairness Act for the Required Release of a Woman Accused of a Non-Violent Class 4 felony offense.

Kendall County State’s Attorney Eric Weis Spreads Misinformation About the Pretrial Fairness Act

Kankakee County State Attorney Jim Rowe Spreads Disinformation About Detainable Offenses

Kane County State’s Attorney Jamie Mosser Spreads Misinformation About Trespassing Cases

Madison County State's Attorney Denies Ability to Set Conditions on Pretrial Release

Cook County Judge & Prosecutor Make False Claims About the Detention Net

Alderman Lopez Stokes Fear Following Mugging in Bucktown

Sheriff Dart Misleads the Public About Electronic Monitoring House Arrest Conditions